A nova constituição bolivariana indígena socialista comunista da Bolívia!

“Aquí se acabó el pasado colonial. Aquí se acabó el neoliberalismo. Aquí se acabó el latifundismo. Mandaremos y gobernaremos como nos pide el pueblo boliviano, y el pueblo ha refundado Bolivia”.

http://www.elpais.com/elpaismedia/diario/media/200711/29/internacional/20071129elpepiint_1_Pes_PDF.pdf

Novo site do Proin facilita pesquisa nos arquivos do DEOPS

Segunda-feira, 19 de Janeiro de 2009 às 21h07

No sábado, 24, entrará no ar o novo site do Projeto Integrado Arquivo Público do Estado e Universidade de São Paulo (PROIN), que estará disponível por meio do endereço http://www.usp.br/proin/. A iniciativa vai facilitar as atividades de pesquisa do público na documentação do Departamento Estadual de Ordem Política e Social do Estado de São Paulo (DEOPS), datadas do período entre 1924 a 1983.

 

A coordenação do projeto é da professora Maria Luiza Tucci Carneiro, do Departamento de História (DH) da Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas (FFLCH) da USP. O setor de iconografia é coordenado pelo professor Boris Kossoy, da Escola de Comunicações e Artes (ECA) da USP, e responsável pela elaboração de um banco de imagens que, em breve, também poderá ser consultado.

 

“Antes do trabalho realizado pelo PROIN, para localizar algum prontuário, era necessário pesquisar diretamente nas fichas microfilmadas. Quando a ficha era encontrada, era preciso anotar o número do prontuário e passar para o pessoal do arquivo encontrar o material. Agora, basta digitar o nome de uma pessoa ou de uma instituição para ter acesso à ficha policial e ao número do prontuário”, conta Luciana Cammarota, uma das pesquisadoras envolvidas no projeto e que trabalha com prontuários de imigrantes italianos. Além dos prontuários (cerca de 150 mil), o arquivo conta com aproximadamente 1,5 milhão de fichas policiais que remetem a cerca de 9 mil dossiês.

 

O site é composto por cinco categorias de pesquisa. Uma delas é “Fichas Policiais”: “Nessas fichas foi mantida a grafia original do documento policial”, aponta Adriana Ferreira, graduada em História que pesquisa os imigrantes, sobretudo os do Leste Europeu. A partir dessas fichas, o pesquisador terá acesso ao número do prontuário ou ao seu conteúdo sintetizado, disponível na categoria “Cadastro Proin”. Dos 150 mil prontuários, aproximadamente 3 mil já foram inventariados.

 

Outra categoria de busca será “Impressos” – base de dados que permite conhecer os impressos revolucionários (jornais, panfletos e livros) confiscados pelo Deops. Este inventário deu origem ao catálogo “Jornais confiscados pelo DEOPS, 1924-1954″, organizado por Kossoy e Tucci Carneiro, cujo segundo número está previsto para sair neste ano. Haverá ainda um link especial, dedicado aos “Estrangeiros expulsos”, e que foi idealizado pela historiadora Mariana Cardoso Ribeiro que desenvolveu suas pesquisas de mestrado e doutorado em História Social na FFLCH.

 

Iconografia

 

Outro acesso possível será “Iconografia”. As imagens são acompanhadas de uma ficha técnica idealizada pelo professor Kossoy e que vem sendo preenchida com base nas informações pesquisadas junto aos prontuários e dossiês policiais. De acordo com a pesquisadora Michele Celestino, o objetivo do banco iconográfico é mostrar, através de imagens, a história da repressão no Brasil. “Nos prontuários, encontramos uma diversificada tipologia de imagens como as fotos confiscadas de álbuns particulares, por exemplo. Além de ser necessário analisar o prontuário para entender o contexto histórico em que uma imagem foi produzida, é necessário também “ler” as imagens sob o ponto de vista iconológico, de acordo com as propostas teóricas do professor Kossoy”, comenta. A idéia, segundo ela, é digitalizar todas as imagens que sejam representativas dos fundos DEOPS/SP e do Departamento de Imprensa e Propaganda (DEIP). Atualmente, este Banco de Dados possui cerca de 300 imagens já digitalizadas.

 

Inúmeras exposições iconográficas já foram realizadas com base no material do arquivo. A mais recente, “Círculo Fechado: os japoneses sob a mira do DEOPS”, de curadoria de Kossoy com pesquisa de Márcia Yumi Takeuchi, será aberta no próximo dia 24 por ocasião da inauguração do Memorial da Resistência de São Paulo, no antigo prédio do DEOPS.

 

Além de Adriana Ferreira, Michele Celestino e Luciana Cammarota, também participam do PROIN os pesquisadores graduados Luciana Marta, que pesquisa os intelectuais vigiados; Milena Issler, responsável pelo design do site; e Olivia Pavani, que trabalha com as pautas de serviço do DEIP. Integram ainda a equipe os graduandos em História Mônica Torres e Rodrigo Vazquez que trabalham, respectivamente, com os impressos confiscados (panfletos, livros, jornais e revistas) e a iconografia.

 

O projeto conta ainda com a participação dos professores da UNINOVE Antonio de Pádua Fernandes Bueno, Regina Célia Pedroso, Carlos Boucault, além dos professores da USP Elizabeth Cancelli (DH/FFLCH), Federico Croci (Departamento de Letras Modernas / FFLCH), e também de Pedro Ortiz (TV USP e Cásper Líbero), e de Priscila F. Perazzo (Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul/USCS).

 

Outra vertente de pesquisa do PROIN é realizada por Olívia Pavani, que pesquisa as Pautas de Serviço produzidas pelo Departamento de Imprensa e Propaganda (DEIP), instituição fundada em 1941. As Pautas de Serviço estão organizadas em 78 volumes, produzidas entre os anos de 1943 e 1946. “Elas trazem informações oficiais produzidas pelo governo para divulgação na imprensa.

 

A documentação produzida pelo DEIP de São Paulo agrupa inclusive informações sobre o que os DEIPS de outros Estados estavam noticiando. Entre as reportagens produzidas por esta instituição, podemos destacar a cobertura da visita do Interventor Fernando Costa pelo interior do Estado de São Paulo em outubro de 1943”, explica. Encontra-se em processo de elaboração um banco de dados on-line que também facilitará o acesso a essa documentação.

 

O projeto

 

O PROIN foi criado em 1995. Em 2007, o Projeto conseguiu aprovar junto a Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (Fapesp) o segundo projeto temático “Arquivos da Repressão e da Resistência: mapeamento e digitalização dos Fundos DEOPS e DEIP”, desta vez envolvendo nove professores doutores. Estes recursos permitiram a revitalização do Laboratório de Informática PROIN com novos equipamentos, além de renovar a equipe de monitores com 6 graduados e 2 graduandos.

 

Desde o início de suas atividades, a sala do PROIN tem sido utilizada pelos professores envolvidos com o projeto como uma oficina de história. Nesse espaço, os alunos de graduação da USP e de outras universidades entram em contato com a documentação. “A partir disso, vários alunos têm a oportunidade de iniciar projetos de iniciação científica e, posteriormente, pesquisas de mestrado e de doutorado”, destaca Luciana.

 

Da Agência USP de Notícias

 

O que Obama vai fazer – planos de obama – gays, glbt, casamento gay,- adoção por casais homossexuais, governo obama

http://www.whitehouse.gov/agenda/civil_rights/ 

CIVIL RIGHTS

“The teenagers and college students who left their homes to march in the streets of Birmingham and Montgomery; the mothers who walked instead of taking the bus after a long day of doing somebody else’s laundry and cleaning somebody else’s kitchen — they didn’t brave fire hoses and Billy clubs so that their grandchildren and their great-grandchildren would still wonder at the beginning of the 21st century whether their vote would be counted; whether their civil rights would be protected by their government; whether justice would be equal and opportunity would be theirs…. We have more work to do.”– Barack Obama, Speech at Howard University, September 28, 2007

President Barack Obama has spent much of his career fighting to strengthen civil rights as a civil rights attorney, community organizer, Illinois State Senator, U.S. Senator, and now as President. Whether promoting economic opportunity, working to improve our nation’s education and health system, or protecting the right to vote, President Obama has been a powerful advocate for our civil rights.

• Combat Employment Discrimination: President Obama and Vice President Biden will work to overturn the Supreme Court’s recent ruling that curtails racial minorities’ and women’s ability to challenge pay discrimination. They will also pass the Fair Pay Act, to ensure that women receive equal pay for equal work, and the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, to prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity or expression.
• Expand Hate Crimes Statutes: President Obama and Vice President Biden will strengthen federal hate crimes legislation, expand hate crimes protection by passing the Matthew Shepard Act, and reinvigorate enforcement at the Department of Justice’s Criminal Section.
• End Deceptive Voting Practices: President Obama will sign into law his legislation that establishes harsh penalties for those who have engaged in voter fraud and provides voters who have been misinformed with accurate and full information so they can vote.
• End Racial Profiling: President Obama and Vice President Biden will ban racial profiling by federal law enforcement agencies and provide federal incentives to state and local police departments to prohibit the practice.
• Reduce Crime Recidivism by Providing Ex-Offender Support: President Obama and Vice President Biden will provide job training, substance abuse and mental health counseling to ex-offenders, so that they are successfully re-integrated into society. Obama and Biden will also create a prison-to-work incentive program to improve ex-offender employment and job retention rates.
• Eliminate Sentencing Disparities: President Obama and Vice President Biden believe the disparity between sentencing crack and powder-based cocaine is wrong and should be completely eliminated.
• Expand Use of Drug Courts: President Obama and Vice President Biden will give first-time, non-violent offenders a chance to serve their sentence, where appropriate, in the type of drug rehabilitation programs that have proven to work better than a prison term in changing bad behavior.

Support for the LGBT Community

“While we have come a long way since the Stonewall riots in 1969, we still have a lot of work to do. Too often, the issue of LGBT rights is exploited by those seeking to divide us. But at its core, this issue is about who we are as Americans. It’s about whether this nation is going to live up to its founding promise of equality by treating all its citizens with dignity and respect.”– Barack Obama, June 1, 2007

• Expand Hate Crimes Statutes: In 2004, crimes against LGBT Americans constituted the third-highest category of hate crime reported and made up more than 15 percent of such crimes. President Obama cosponsored legislation that would expand federal jurisdiction to include violent hate crimes perpetrated because of race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, gender identity, or physical disability. As a state senator, President Obama passed tough legislation that made hate crimes and conspiracy to commit them against the law.
• Fight Workplace Discrimination: President Obama supports the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, and believes that our anti-discrimination employment laws should be expanded to include sexual orientation and gender identity. While an increasing number of employers have extended benefits to their employees’ domestic partners, discrimination based on sexual orientation in the workplace occurs with no federal legal remedy. The President also sponsored legislation in the Illinois State Senate that would ban employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
• Support Full Civil Unions and Federal Rights for LGBT Couples: President Obama supports full civil unions that give same-sex couples legal rights and privileges equal to those of married couples. Obama also believes we need to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act and enact legislation that would ensure that the 1,100+ federal legal rights and benefits currently provided on the basis of marital status are extended to same-sex couples in civil unions and other legally-recognized unions. These rights and benefits include the right to assist a loved one in times of emergency, the right to equal health insurance and other employment benefits, and property rights.
• Oppose a Constitutional Ban on Same-Sex Marriage: President Obama voted against the Federal Marriage Amendment in 2006 which would have defined marriage as between a man and a woman and prevented judicial extension of marriage-like rights to same-sex or other unmarried couples.
• Repeal Don’t Ask-Don’t Tell: President Obama agrees with former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff John Shalikashvili and other military experts that we need to repeal the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. The key test for military service should be patriotism, a sense of duty, and a willingness to serve. Discrimination should be prohibited. The U.S. government has spent millions of dollars replacing troops kicked out of the military because of their sexual orientation. Additionally, more than 300 language experts have been fired under this policy, including more than 50 who are fluent in Arabic. The President will work with military leaders to repeal the current policy and ensure it helps accomplish our national defense goals.
• Expand Adoption Rights: President Obama believes that we must ensure adoption rights for all couples and individuals, regardless of their sexual orientation. He thinks that a child will benefit from a healthy and loving home, whether the parents are gay or not.
• Promote AIDS Prevention: In the first year of his presidency, President Obama will develop and begin to implement a comprehensive national HIV/AIDS strategy that includes all federal agencies. The strategy will be designed to reduce HIV infections, increase access to care and reduce HIV-related health disparities. The President will support common sense approaches including age-appropriate sex education that includes information about contraception, combating infection within our prison population through education and contraception, and distributing contraceptives through our public health system. The President also supports lifting the federal ban on needle exchange, which could dramatically reduce rates of infection among drug users. President Obama has also been willing to confront the stigma — too often tied to homophobia — that continues to surround HIV/AIDS.
• Empower Women to Prevent HIV/AIDS: In the United States, the percentage of women diagnosed with AIDS has quadrupled over the last 20 years. Today, women account for more than one quarter of all new HIV/AIDS diagnoses. President Obama introduced the Microbicide Development Act, which will accelerate the development of products that empower women in the battle against AIDS. Microbicides are a class of products currently under development that women apply topically to prevent transmission of HIV and other infections.

A liberdade e a esquerda

A maior parte das pessoas na esquerda não se opõe à liberdade. Elas apenas são favoráveis a todo tipo de coisas que são incompatíveis com a liberdade.

Liberdade significa, no fim das contas, o direito de as pessoas fazerem coisas que nós não aprovamos. Os nazistas tinham o direito de ser nazistas sob Hitler. Somos livres apenas quando somos capazes de fazer coisas que outros não aprovam.

Um dos mais aparentemente inocentes exemplos das muitas imposições da visão da esquerda sobre os outros é a difundida exigência das escolas e universidades do “serviço comunitário”, para admissão de estudantes.

Há escolas de ensino médio em todo o país em que você não se forma, e faculdades em que você não entra, a menos que tenha se engajado em atividades arbitrariamente definidas como “serviço comunitário”.

A arrogância de se confiscar o tempo dos jovens – em vez de deixá-los (e a seus pais) livres para decidir como usar seu tempo – só não é maior que a arrogância de se impor o que é ou não é um serviço à comunidade.

Trabalhar num abrigo de sem-teto é amplamente considerado um “serviço comunitário” – como se ajudar e se acumpliciar com a vagabundagem fosse necessariamente um serviço, em vez de um desserviço, à comunidade.

Estará a comunidade mais bem servida com mais desempregados vagando pelas ruas, agressivamente mendigando pelas calçadas, urinando nos muros, deixando agulhas e seringas nos parques onde as crianças brincam?

Este é apenas um dos muitos modos em que a distribuição dos vários tipos de benefícios a pessoas que não trabalham rompe a conexão entre produtividade e recompensa.

Mas essa conexão permanece tão inquebrável como sempre esteve para a sociedade como um todo. Você pode fazer de qualquer coisa um “direito” para indivíduos ou grupos, mas nada é um direito para a sociedade como um todo, nem mesmo comida ou abrigo, que têm de ser produzidos pelo trabalho de alguém ou eles não existirão.

Para alguns, o que “direitos” significam é forçar outras pessoas a trabalharem para o benefício deles. Como uma frase de pára-choque de caminhão diz: “Trabalhe duro. Milhões de pessoas on welfare [vivendo dos programas sociais do governo] estão dependendo de você.”

O mais fundamental dos problemas, contudo, não é que atividades particulares são exigidas dos estudantes sob o título “serviços comunitários”.

A pergunta fundamental é: O que, afinal, qualifica professores e membros das comissões de admissão das faculdades a definir o que é bom para a sociedade como um todo, ou mesmo para os estudantes sobre os quais são impostas suas noções arbitrárias?

Qual especialidade eles têm que justifica sobrepor-se à liberdade dos outros? O que suas imposições mostram, exceto que “os idiotas abundam onde os anjos temem pisar”1?

Que lições os estudantes aprendem disso, exceto a de submissão a um poder arbitrário?

A finalidade é, supostamente, a de que os estudantes adquiram um sentido de compaixão ou nobreza por meio do serviço aos outros. Mas isso depende de quem define compaixão. Na prática, isso significa forçar os estudantes a se submeterem à propaganda para fazê-los receptivos à visão de mundo da esquerda.

Estou certo de que aqueles favoráveis às exigências de “serviços comunitários” entenderiam o princípio por trás das objeções a esses serviços se exercícios militares fossem exigidos nas escolas de ensino médio.

De fato, muitos que promovem o “serviço comunitário” obrigatório são fortemente contrários ao treinamento militar mesmo voluntário nas escolas de ensino médio e faculdades, embora muitos outros considerem esse treinamento como uma contribuição à sociedade muito maior que alimentar pessoas que se recusam a trabalhar.

Em outras palavras, esquerdistas querem o direito de impor suas idéias do que é bom para toda a sociedade – um direito que eles veementemente negam àqueles cujas idéias do que é bom para a sociedade diferem das deles.

A essência da intolerância é recusar aos outros os direitos que você exige para si próprio. Tal intolerância é inerentemente incompatível com a liberdade, embora muitos esquerdistas fiquem chocados de serem considerados oponentes da liberdade.

Townhall   com

Tradução de Antônio Emílio Angueth de Araújo

O mundo mudado

casal gay adota 4 irmãos

http://oglobo.globo.com/sp/mat/2009/01/15/casal-homossexual-adota-4-irmaos-em-ribeirao-preto-720372646.asp

A islamização da Inglaterra

MUSLIMS CAN CLAIM BENEFITS FOR SEVERAL WIVES, SAY MINISTERS

 

GRAYLING: ‘Government trying to keep December ruling quiet’

Monday February 4,2008

By Gabriel Milland Political Correspondent

Have your say(45)

HUSBANDS who bring more than one wife to Britain can claim extra benefits for them at taxpayers’ expense.

Ministers have ruled that men in polygamous marriages can receive state handouts for each wife, including additional income support, even though bigamy is illegal in the UK.

A review of benefit rules for such marriages concluded in December that allowing husbands to claim for their additional wives remained the “best possible” option.

The decision will chiefly benefit Muslim men, as Islamic law allows them to have up to four wives.

Multi-marriages are recognised by the Government – provided the weddings took place in countries where the practice is legal. But critics last night attacked the decision as “completely unacceptable” and warned it could lead to demands for other changes in British laws.

Corin Taylor, of the Taxpayers’ Alliance, said: “British taxpayers are paying a record amount of tax so the Government has a duty to make sure that every penny is spent properly.

“Polygamy is not something which British law allows and British taxpayers should not have to pay for extra benefits for second or third wives.”

Tory spokesman Chris Grayling said: “You are not allowed to have multiple marriages in the UK, so to have a situation where the benefits system is treating people in different ways is totally unacceptable and will serve to undermine confidence in the system.

“This sets a precedent that will lead to more demands for the culture of other countries to be reflected in UK law and the benefits system.”

Mr Grayling accused the Government of trying to keep the December ruling quiet because the topic was so controversial.

While a married man cannot obtain a spouse visa to bring a second wife into Britain, some multiple partners may be able to enter the country via other legal routes such as tourist visas, student visas or work permits.

There are an estimated 1,000 polygamous marriages in the UK, meaning there could be up to 5,000 people involved.

The husband would be entitled to £90.80 a week income support for himself and his first wife and £33.65 for each additional wife.

The families would also be entitled to child benefits for every child and could argue for greater housing benefit and council tax credits because of the need for larger properties.

A spokeswoman for the Department for Work and Pensions said: “There are fewer than 1,000 polygamous marriages in the UK and only a small percentage of these are claiming social security benefit.

“We recently reviewed the rules regarding benefit payments to customers in a polygamous marriage, which concluded that the rules in place since 1987 provide the necessary safeguards to ensure there is no financial advantage for claimants in a valid polygamous marriage.”

MINISTERS ISLAMIZING BRITAIN

05.04.08, 2:54pm

On learning about this matter, I am incensed with the government for the outcome of the December ruling. I feel that I can only express my complete dismay and horrified shock, that the government of our British multicultural cosmopolitan society, despite our country’s deep Christian roots, should ever go this far in allowing ONE PARTICULAR RELIGIOUS DENOMINATION TO BE AWARDED SUCH A PRIVILEGE OVER ALL OTHER CITIZENS. It seems that the UK is becoming a victim of multiculturalism going too far and now it goes for segregation rather than integration of immigrants into British society by allowing religious privileges in an unevenhanded unfair manner. How can we say we have full integration of Muslims into British society when they get extra privileges that no other groups of our society receive? It simply is not fair to privilege one group over the others. More to the point, this widely opens the door to other concessions on the basis of religion.

As far as I am aware, UK citizens of other religious faiths do not receive any similar economic privileges according to their particular beliefs or practices. I also believe that the majority of UK taxpayers and UK citizens that profess no faith at all would certainly not want any UK citizens of any particular religious group to receive any status of rank, preference or privilege giving them an advantage over other UK citizens because it would be considered UNFAIR. It is highly questionable whether any particular religion should be privileged in the UK over other groups of society, but if indeed such a privileged status should be given to a religious community in the UK, then surely the traditional British Christian state religion is the only one that can reasonably be privileged in the British lawmaking process, is it not? What happened to the traditional Christian family values reflected in the married person’s tax allowance? Abolished by Gordon Brown! If he hands benefits to Muslims for multiple wives he has a duty to reinstate equivalent tax breaks for married persons, otherwise he favours Muslim citizens over the rest of our society. He should read this.

Why should taxpayers’ money be wasted paying benefits or tax breaks to up to four Muslim wives rather than one like for everyone else, just because Muslim law allows a man to have more than one wife at any given time? Is it not still the case that British law forbids any British citizen or person living in the UK, of whatever religion, from getting married again while already married and from being married to more than one wife at any given time, i.e. polygamy? Why should Muslim marriages to multiple wives having occurred outside the UK be legally binding after immigration into the UK for such persons involved and thus unfairly take privileges that the rest of UK citizens do not enjoy or even desire to have? I think that it is awfully unfair for our government to allow Muslims or any other religious group to have privileges or advantages on account of their religious practices which other citizens do not have, of which the above benefit case is an example.

I fear that my second concern as follows relates to the above mentioned matter and is not misplaced but is quite reasonable. By expressing it here, I declare my vehement belief in constructive debate based on complete peaceful uncensored religious and political freedom of speech in the UK. As such I do not consider my remarks in any way racist or inflammatory, rather they are a reasonable expression of my personal viewpoint to which many other people also subscribe but dare not express publicly as they lack the courage of conviction.

I must confess that I consider immigration into western European countries such as the UK as mainly but certainly not only the result of the majority of migrants trying to improve their quality of life. In particular, consider that a significant proportion of Muslim citizens’ immigrate with the clear intention to propagate the influence of their religion in other non-Islamic states. As a religion of peace, that seems harmless enough on first contemplation. Provided that such religious citizens do not gain sufficient influence in our society to be detrimental to other citizens’ freedom to live by their own secular or other religious choices, it remains a religion of peace and tolerance. History tells us, however, that when any particular religion dominates a society, it becomes intolerant of other dissenting religions and marginalises them and their followers. This was seen during the Catholic and Protestant struggles of 16th and 17th century England between the reigns of Queen Mary and Elizabeth I, and again under James I and Charles I including the Civil War. Look at past Catholic domination of Spain and the brutal Inquisition. Look at Islamic states today and you will see lack of freedom for other religions there. This is precise the reason why no religious group should be privileged over others. The problem that I believe I quite rightly fear and point out here, regarding the Muslims’ increasing influence on UK politics and the legislative process in particular, using the freedom afforded them by multiculturalism, is their ultimate long-term agenda of religious duty, which if devoutly followed by even moderate Muslims, aims to slowly convert a country such as the UK into an Islamic state if that were possible. Such an aim will inevitably cause conflict in societies of mixed religion, particularly in traditionally Christian democracies. I believe that the Muslims’ achievement of gradual changes in UK law including gaining specific benefit, tax or other privileges or concessions due to their religious status forms an integral part of this islamization process. As such, I fear that if this trend is not “nipped in the bud”, stopped or reversed soon, at some time it will be too late for any government to reverse the overwhelming tide of increasing Muslim religious privilege and we will see the UK adopting Islamic laws into UK law and being enforced amongst Muslims. This will firstly be a religious concession applying only to practising Muslims but years from now if their growing political influence is allowed to reach a critical level, the first step of privilege for Muslims today will have been the “thin end of the wedge” and UK Muslims will have enough political means that they then seek to impose the application of more and more Muslim laws in the UK. Once the rule of the entire Islamic law is complete and enforceable over every UK Muslim, by then the UK has already become a partial Islamic state. It will then be just one more step to impose the application of Islamic law on EVERY British citizen, thus making Britain a complete Islamic state. I greatly fear this scenario, which will lead to civil unrest at the very least, if not worse, as a possible and realistic outcome to be reasonably expected in the UK, if the government fails to reverse or restrict this trend of religious privileges in the UK legislative process. The current mass immigration into the UK of citizens from new eastern EU member states, of which the largest religious group is the Catholics, is perhaps the only Christian influence that will counter the Islamization of Britain.

Furthermore, this brings me to my third point, that there is far too much immigration into the UK, presently at an unsustainable level due to the strain on our society resulting from it in terms of resources such as employment, public services and housing. Even if there are enough jobs for migrant workers as well as existing UK citizens, we do not have enough housing to meet the existing demand, so further immigration can only put housing and rent prices up whilst at the same time keeping wages down due to increased labour market competition, thus lowering the standard of living in the UK for many.

Thanks for reading.

• Posted by: Polyglot • Report Comment

WOMEN TAKE HEED

05.02.08, 7:53am

If we allow Islam to take hold of our land we will be back in the dark ages.
Value the freedom we enjoy.
Dont allow this freedom to be taken away.
Dont turn a blind eye and think that this can never happen.
To discover your future…look to your past.
The world changes constantly and many civilisations have been plundered and lost through complacency.

• Posted by: abuela • Report Comment

SEARCH UK NEWS for:

Estamos vivendo em uma sociedade ginecrocrática?

Por Julius Evola, “Do We Live in a Gynaecocratic Society?”: http://thompkins_cariou.tripod.com/id8.html

Previous Posts